What Is Maximum Term Contract

Have you ever wondered what the difference is between fixed and maximum contracts? A contract of maximum duration sets a date on which both parties agree that the employment relationship will end. It follows from those considerations that the Commission will review the entire contractual relationship if it determines whether a worker with a continuous `fixed-term` contract is entitled to bring an action for unjustified dismissal. A fixed-term employment contract may provide for a qualified right to terminate the employment relationship for certain reasons. For example, “If you fail to correct an unsatisfactory performance within one month of notification of the poor performance, the company can terminate the contract immediately. Contracts with a maximum duration or caps are often used by employers in Australia because they allow an employee to be employed for a certain period of time, with the possibility of terminating the contract by notice before the deadline expires. The use of maximum-duration contracts is especially popular for project-based work or situations where external factors can affect an employer`s ability to hire employees (for example. B, when the job depends on the employer who obtains government funds or successfully rewrites them for work). On the other hand, a maximum-term contract may be preferable in situations where you: Whether it`s time to refresh your employment contracts, discuss options, or simply make sure your contracts are legally compliant and conform to your industry best practices, our Industrial Relations and Security team can help. Do not hesitate to contact us. However, within the framework of a maximum contract, both parties reserve the right to terminate the employment relationship by termination without giving reasons or reasons.

The parties do not expect (at least not under the terms of the contract) that employment will continue for the duration or maximum duration specified in the contract. Fixed-term employment contracts can be effective in circumstances where a person`s employment is only necessary for a certain period of time. This may include covering periods of parental or long-term leave for another employee, or hiring an employee for the exact duration of a particular project. If there have been no ongoing renewals, fixed-term contracts also offer employers the option to choose not to renew an employment contract on the specified expiry date without the complexity associated with performance management, disciplinary proceedings or the risks associated with wrongful dismissal. In many industries, it is customary to extend or renew fixed-term or maximum-term contracts. B for example for consecutive periods of 6 or 12 months. It is important to note that the Fair Work Board states that the expiry of a contract of maximum duration does not exempt an employer from a lawsuit for unfair dismissal. The FWC formulated a five-point test for claims for unfair dismissal from contracts of maximum duration: this was discussed in White v. Sydney College of English Pty Ltd, where it was found that the unlimited right to terminate an agreement meant that the agreement was not a contract within the meaning of section 386(b)(ii) of the FW Act for a certain period of time, and as such, may have allowed the employee access to the termination protection provisions if the contract was terminated prematurely. Indeed, the termination clause of the agreement meant that the contract was valid indefinitely and that the date of termination merely set the external limit of a period beyond which the employment contract would not exceed. Following the new decision in the Navitas case, employers can no longer presume that the expiry of a fixed-term contract excludes them from an action for unfair dismissal.

The majority of FWC Full Bench members have formulated a five-point criterion to be used to assess whether an employee may cause unjustified dismissal after the expiry of his fixed-term contract: 3. In cases where the parties agree that their contract expires at a certain time but have not agreed to terminate their employment relationship, this does not exclude: that the termination of the employment relationship took place at the initiative of the employer. If you need help determining which contract will benefit you the most, please contact our HR Assured team today. The plenary noted that the right approach was to look at the entire employment relationship, rather than simply considering the termination of the last of a series of employment contracts. The conduct of employers will be an essential factor in assessing an employee`s ability to bring an unwarranted action for protection from dismissal. It is essential that employers have systems in place to ensure that any conduct or assurance given during the job offer, during the term of the contract or in connection with the termination of the contract does not adversely affect it (p.B. provide appropriate training to hiring managers). The FWC noted that Mr.

Nasr had been employed under successive maximum duration contracts for a “longer period than usual,” but acknowledged that there were real operational reasons for offering Mr. Nasr eight separate contracts. [3] It is important to note that Mr. Nasr did not work in the same job in all contracts. He moved from one department to another and was sometimes employed on the night shift while working the day shift under other contracts. In this case, an employee was employed under a number of maximum fixed-term contracts. At the end of the term of the last of these contracts, his employer decided not to offer another contract to the employee because he had concerns about the employee`s performance. The employee argued that this was a termination since his employment relationship had been terminated at the initiative of his employer. His employer denied his claim, arguing instead that his employment had been terminated simply by the effect of time. A recent decision by a Full Bench Fair Trade Commission (FWC) opened the door for employees with maximum-term contracts to assert rights to protection against dismissal by abolishing the principle that the expiry of a fixed-term contract is not a dismissal at the initiative of the employer. If you are considering firing an employee hired under a maximum-term contract, contact the HR law team for advice. The FWC referred and relied on the main decision of the full bench in Khayam v.

Navitas English Pty Ltd (Navitas), which sets out the general principles for determining whether or not there is a `dismissal` within the meaning of Article 386(1)(a) of the Law where a contract of employment reaches its expiry date. [2] These principles can be paraphrased as follows: This type of contract is often used when there is a specific project that requires more staff, whether companies enter busy trading hours such as Christmas for retailers or for parental leave coverage. .

Return to Top ▲Return to Top ▲